<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Prevention | ISSUES | The Ohio State University</title><link>https://issues-osu.github.io/ISSUESlab/tag/prevention/</link><atom:link href="https://issues-osu.github.io/ISSUESlab/tag/prevention/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Prevention</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>No Bright Line: How AI-driven Technology Blurs Legal Boundaries Between Prevention and Punishment in Family Regulation</title><link>https://issues-osu.github.io/ISSUESlab/presentations/ai-cps/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://issues-osu.github.io/ISSUESlab/presentations/ai-cps/</guid><description>&lt;p>This new article by &lt;strong>Dr. Gia E. Barboza-Salerno&lt;/strong> argues that &lt;strong>Predictive Risk Models (PRMs)&lt;/strong> can be effective when focused on &lt;em>prevention&lt;/em>. The argument is grounded in two core principles. The first is a rights-based balancing approach that extends beyond privacy concerns to encompass due process protections tied to legally recognized status.&lt;br>
The second emphasizes that PRMs, rather than serving solely as detection or risk assessment tools, can help &lt;strong>identify structural risk factors&lt;/strong>, &lt;strong>guide equitable public investment&lt;/strong>, and &lt;strong>promote accountability&lt;/strong>, without expanding surveillance or punitive measures that compound systemic harm.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Together, these principles challenge the false dichotomy between prevention and punishment that underlies much of AI’s deployment in family regulation. By integrating a legal and ethical framework rooted in rights protection and structural accountability, the article redefines what responsible and justice-oriented AI looks like in the context of family welfare systems.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>Read the full article here:&lt;/strong> &lt;em>&amp;ldquo;Barboza-Salerno, G. E. (2025). No bright line: How AI-driven technology blurs legal boundaries between prevention and punishment in family regulation. &lt;em>Family Advocate, 47&lt;/em>(2), 00–00. American Bar Association.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em>&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>