Enhancing Brain Injury Surveillance Using Large Language Models and Topic Modeling

Sun, 19 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Our presentation, Enhancing Brain Injury Surveillance Using Large Language Models and Topic Modeling, was delivered by Dr. Shockley McCarthy at the AI for BI Conference at The Ohio State University on October 17, 2025.

This work introduces an AI-driven framework for improving the detection and contextual understanding of brain injury cases using unstructured medical and administrative text. By applying large language models (LLMs) and structured topic modeling, we extract interpretable patterns from injury narratives and ICD-coded data to identify mechanisms of injury, intent, and underreported cases of intimate partner violence (IPV)–related brain injury.

Integrating methods from public health, law, and computational linguistics, our approach aims to enhance the precision of injury surveillance systems and inform equitable prevention and policy strategies addressing violence-related traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Download the presentation here .

Nicolette Peremen

Sun, 19 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Nicolette Peremen is an Undergraduate Research Assistant and Writer in the ISSUES Lab.

She is a junior at The Ohio State University. She is a public health major, with a concentration in sociology. She also has a minor in professional writing. She currently holds a position on her sorority’s executive board as the Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion chair. In the spring 2026 semester, she will be studying abroad in Copenhagen with the hopes of expanding her understanding of community and global outreach. Nicolette is very excited to be joining the team.

Their work focuses on implementing and writing laws and policies. They are interested in drug prevention and violence prevention.

Intimate Partner Violence & Brain Injury in U.S. Adults: Findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2021

Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000

Overview

National survey data show that adults who screen positive for intimate partner violence (IPV) experience more injuries and face greater medical costs than those who do not. Nine million screened IPV-positive using the HITS screening tool, and survivors were significantly more likely to utilize emergency rooms and hospitals for treating their injuries. Head and brain injuries were much more frequent among IPV survivors, and the average cost of treating these injuries was nearly twice as high compared to adults who did not screen positive for IPV.

Key Messages

Approximately 9 million adults screened positive for IPV in 2021.
IPV-positive adults had 3–4× higher ER and inpatient injury rates than IPV-negative adults.
Adults who screened positive for IPV experienced more than twice the rate of brain-injury healthcare events compared to those who screened negative.
Average per-capita spending on brain-injury care was about twice as high among IPV-positive adults.
Inpatient TBI events are less common than ER events but far more costly; counts and spending are higher among IPV-positive adults.
Poverty, social stressors, depression, and chronic conditions are significantly associated with IPV screen positivity.

Policy Relevance & Recommendations

Standardized protocols: Implement routine protocols so that IPV-positive patients with head injury are screened for brain injury, and patients with head injury are also screened for IPV.
Integrated referral pathways: Establish clear referral systems across emergency, primary, and specialty care so that when screening protocols are triggered, patients are automatically connected to appropriate follow-up services.
Follow-up for delayed symptoms: Incorporate temporal follow-up in care plans, recognizing that brain injury symptoms may appear or worsen over time.
Accessibility and appropriateness: Ensure screening and follow-up services are accessible, widely available, and tailored to the needs of IPV survivors.
Holistic screening: Extend screening beyond identifying head injury to include social and health needs that may magnify injury effects and increase vulnerability to future IPV.
Care coordination: Utilize medical social workers and interdisciplinary teams to integrate medical, psychosocial, and safety needs into a comprehensive care response.

Methodology

This brief analyzes nationally representative data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey—Household Component (MEPS-HC) 2021. Adults (age ≥18) were classified as IPV screen-positive if they scored ≥10 on the Hurt, Insult, Threaten, Scream (HITS) scale, a validated four-item screening tool for intimate partner violence.

Injury outcomes were identified using ICD-10-CM codes and Clinical Classifications Software Refined (CCSR) groupings from the MEPS Conditions file, with condition–event linkages used to assign emergency department (ER), inpatient, outpatient, office-based, home health, and prescription care to specific injuries. Brain injuries were defined as traumatic brain injury (ICD-10 S06) and other head injuries (S00–S09).

We estimated:

Injury and brain-injury events per 100 adults,
Per-capita spending (in 2021 USD), and
Weighted counts of injury-linked encounters.

Analyses applied MEPS survey weights (PERWT21F) and accounted for the complex design (VARSTR, VARPSU). We used survey-weighted generalized linear models (svyglm) to generate adjusted comparisons standardized over age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Risk ratios were estimated for sociodemographic factors, health-related social needs, and chronic health conditions associated with IPV screen positivity.

Suggested Citation

Barboza-Salerno, G. E., Shockley McCarthy, K., Watson-Grace, A., Harrington, T., McCarthy, M. A., Peremen, N., & McLucas, O. (2025). Intimate Partner Violence & Brain Injury in U.S. Adults: Findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2021. Policy brief. The Ohio State University, ISSUE Lab (Investigating Spatial Structures in Urban Environments).

Download

Download the full brief for more information

Nicolette Peremen | ISSUES | The Ohio State University